top of page
fusion-medical-animation-rnr8D3FNUNY-unsplash-scaled.jpg

epstein-BARR VirUS 

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a highly prevalent herpesvirus that infects over 95% of the global adult population. Initial exposure typically occurs in childhood or adolescence and is often asymptomatic; however, in some individuals, it leads to infectious mononucleosis, typically presenting as sore throat, swollen lymph nodes and fever.  
 
After the primary infection, EBV enters its latent phase within immune B cells. Within these B cells, EBV does not replicate, but remains in a transcriptionally active state, meaning it continues to express a select group of viral genes that influence the immune cell’s behavior. This handful of viral genes EBV produces are just enough to maintain its presence without triggering a strong immune response. This delicate equilibrium allows the virus to persist silently for life, while still exerting biological effects that can contribute to disease. 
 
Although EBV latency is often referred to as a ‘quiet’ state, it is far from biologically passive. EBV hijacking of B cell gene expression alters the B cells internal controls, primarily affecting how genes are turned on and off, what proteins are produced, and how the cells communicate. [1][13].
 
This altercation is classed as Latency 0, I, II, and III, which reflect the distinct combination of viral genes expressed. The class of genes are suited to different tissues or disease states. For example:
 

  • EBNA’s proteins alter the expression of genes that regulate cell growth and immune signaling, leading to abnormal cell proliferation and immune misregulation. This mechanism is involved in conditions like systemic lupus, multiple sclerosis and in Hodgkin's lymphoma.

 

  • LMP1 continuously activates signaling pathways such as NF-κB, MAPK, and JNK, which drives chronic inflammation and uncontrolled B-cell growth. This plays a central role in EBV-associated lymphomas such as Hodgkin lymphoma
     

  • LMP2 allows infected B cells that are dysfunctional and autoreactive to avoid cell death, which encourages the production of antibodies. A key feature in autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren’s and Hashimoto's
     

  • EBER’s, which are non-coding RNAs further sustain infection by suppressing key immune functions, including interferon responses and natural killer (NK) cell recognition. This tips immune balance towards persistent inflammation, hallmarks of chronic autoimmunity and inflammation [1][13].
     

The autoimmune diseases and conditions linked to the immune altering actions of EBV are detailed below, along with the specific EBV gene products implicated in their pathogenesis.
 

  • Systemic lupus erythematosus: EBER1, EBER2, EBNA2, EBNA3C 

  • Multiple sclerosis: EBNA1

  • Rheumatoid arthritis: EBNA1, EBNA2

  • Hashimoto's: EBER1, EBNA1, LMP1

  • Graves Disease: EBNA1, LMP1

  • Sjorgens Syndrome: EBER1, EBNA2, LMP1

  • Chrons Disease: EBER1

  • Non H. pylori Positive Gastritis: EBER1

  • Ulcerative Colitis: EBER1

  • Chronic Fatigue: EBNA1 

 
[1][9][11][16][19][20][21][22][24][25]
 
Beyond this, it is important to note that EBV has the ability to alternate between latent ‘quiet’ phases and ’ and lytic ‘active’ phases, which is known as reactivation. During reactivation, the virus produces a broader array of antigens and cytokines, inducing strong inflammatory signals. This increase in viral antigen load and immune activation can drive clinical flares in existing diseases and also attribute to: 
 

  • Fatigue

  • Poor concentration

  • Sleep disturbances

  • Musculoskeletal pain [16]
     

In healthy individuals, reactivation of EBV is usually controlled by the immune system, particularly by cytotoxic T lymphocytes such as CD8+. However, in people with physiological stressors and impaired immune defenses the virus may escape control, resulting in uncontrolled viral replication and abnormal cell growth, worsening diseases and conditions associated with infection[1]
 
Therefore treatment of both latent and lytic phases are essential for managing and reversing latent EBV associated conditions. This can be achieved via natural medicine, which offers a multifaceted approach targeting both phases. 
 
During the latent phase of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, certain plant-derived compounds have been shown to suppress viral proteins such as EBNA and LMP1 and modulate host cellular pathways like STAT3, NF-κB, and PI3K/Akt. Since these proteins and actions play a critical role in promoting immune evasion, cellular dysfunction, and genomic instability, their suppression enhances immune recognition of infected cells and reduces autoimmune responses and oncogenic transformation.

During the active lytic phase of EBV infection, expression of immediate-early genes such as BZLF1 and BRLF1 initiate replication and production of new viral particles and the infection of new cells. Various natural compounds, have been shown to downregulate these immediate-early genes, effectively preventing reactivation of the virus from latency and subsequently reducing viral load [16]

rEactIVAtIon SIGNs

COVID Presentation and Post COVID Fatigue

 

  • Strong fever upon initial COVID infection

  • Stronger inflammatory response upon initial COVID infection 

  • Post COVID Fatigue / Long COVID

 

COVID-19 infection is a trigger for Epstein–Barr Virus reactivation upon initial exposure. This reactivation of EBV together with COVID infection has been clinically associated with an increased probability of experiencing high fevers and stronger inflammation on initial exposure. In a study on 67 participants contracting COVID-19, the researchers found that those with reactivated EBV were 3 x more likely to present with significant fever that were more persistent and could exceed 39 °C, alongside higher inflammatory markers, in opposed to COVID infection without EBV reactivation, where inflammatory reactions were not as elevated and temperature was more controlled. [43]

 

Further studies have shown a clear link between EBV reactivation and experiencing post-COVID fatigue. In one analysis, EBV was tested 7 - 9 months after the initial infection and reactivation was detected in 50% of participants with Long COVID fatigue, compared to 20% of fully recovered individuals. Broader reviews confirm this association, with EBV reactivation markers elevated in 60 - 70% of Long COVID cases, versus about 10% in recovered controls [6][44].

 

In relation to the extent COVID infection has on autoimmune disease, which has potential to be correlated with EBV reactivation. A large study on 

 

1,028,721 COVID-19 cases vs. 3,168,467 controls) quantified the increased relative risk of developing autoimmune conditions after COVID-19. They expressed this as a hazard ration against the risk of developing the following EBV related autoimmune disease compared with people who did not have COVID-19. The increased risk % are as follows:

 

  • 29% - Rheumatoid arthritis

  • 43% - Other autoimmune arthritis

  • 42% - Psoriasis 

  • 30% - Graves’ disease 

  • 166% - Multiple sclerosis [45]


Intermittent or Chronic Fatigue: Unrelieved by rest

 

Intermittent or chronic fatigue is the most consistently reported symptom of Epstein–Barr virus reactivation. Mechanistic this is the result of a combined effect of Epstein-Barr associated mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroimmune inflammation, stress-axis disruption, and immune hyperactivation, all of which together create the feeling of exhaustion, which is unrelieved by rest, and often worsens after exertion.[16]

 

Cognitive Impairments 

 

  • Difficulty concentrating

  • Slowed information processing

  • Memory lapses

  • Reduced mental clarity

 

Cognitive dysfunction, often described as ‘brain fog’, is a common feature of EBV reactivation. It arises from a combination of direct viral interactions with the nervous system, including EBV proteins such as BZLF1, EBNA1, and LMP1 promoting glial cell damage, demyelination, and inflammatory cascades, which are strongly linked to cognitive decline. Longitudinal studies have shown that high plasma markers for chronic EBV reactivation in older adults is also associated with a greater risk of memory loss and increased risk of Alzheimer's. [46]

There are a number of Conditions and Autoimmune Diseases strongly associated with EBV reactivation and latent infection, please focus on what is relevant to you, which has been detailed comprehensively below.

 

  • Chrons Disease

  • Ulcerative Colitis

  • Hashimoto's Thyroiditis

  • Grave’s disease

  • Rheumatoid arthritis

  • Multiple sclerosis

  • Sjögren’s syndrome

  • H.Pylori Negative Gastritis

  • Systemic lupus erythematosus **

 

[1][8]

 

Chrons Disease 

 

Numerous studies have employed EBER detection for EBV-positive cells in colonic mucosal biopsies from patients with Crohn’s disease. In one study involving 11 individuals, EBER was identified in 63% of cases. Another study reported EBER positivity in the colonic mucosa of 81% of Crohn’s disease patients, though the sample size was not specified." [35]

 

In chrons EBV has been shown to spread beyond B lymphocytes and infect colonic epithelial cells, as demonstrated by the detection of EBV DNA in enterocytes. This direct epithelial infection may contribute to mucosal damage and intensify local inflammation. 

 

Furthermore, EBV interferes with the body’s immune system by producing viral proteins such as LMP1 and EBNA1. These proteins disrupt how infected cells are recognized by the immune system and make the infected cells more resistant to being destroyed. They also increase the production of immune-signaling molecules like IL-10 and TNF-α, which can alter normal immune responses. Altogether, these changes lead to immune system imbalance and may trigger autoimmune-like inflammation in the gut.

 

Compounding this, EBV-driven immune activation has been associated with cytotoxic T-cell (CD8⁺) exhaustion and reduced natural killer (NK) cell activity, impairing the host’s ability to control the virus. This immune exhaustion reinforces persistent infection and chronic inflammation, both of which are key features in the progression of Crohn’s disease.[35]

 

Ulcerative Colitis

 

A study of 92 individuals with ulcerative colitis found that approximately 39% had Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) present in their colonic mucosa. The number of EBV-infected cells was significantly associated with more severe disease, marked by increased inflammation, ulcer development, and a higher likelihood of hospitalisation.

 

This association appears to be driven by EBV reactivation within B lymphocytes in the intestinal tissue. The detection of BZLF1, a gene indicating transition to the lytic phase, suggests that the virus had shifted from latency to active replication. This reactivation likely exacerbates mucosal inflammation and contributes to tissue damage and ulceration in affected patients [34].

 

Hashimoto's Thyroiditis

 

EBER expression is a strong marker of latent EBV infection, and is detected in 80.7% of Hashimoto's thyroiditis cases. Additionally, cytoplasmic expression of LMP1, an EBV latent membrane protein was observed in 34.5% of cases These findings suggest a high prevalence of latent EBV presence in Hashimoto's thyroid tissue [9].

 

One study examined EBV-related antibodies in 60 patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT), and 60 healthy individuals. Researchers specifically measured four EBV antibodies in the blood: 

 

  • VCA IgM, linked to recent or acute EBV infection

  • VCA IgG, linked to past EBV infection

  • EBNA-1 IgG, linked to past infection and lifelong viral latency

  • EA IgG, associated with EBV reactivation

 

All participants had positive VCA IgG and EBNA-1 IgG, indicating past EBV exposure. However, about one-third of HT patients showed significantly higher levels of EA IgG, compared to only a few in the control group. Since EA IgG is a marker of reactivation, not acute infection, this suggests that EBV reactivation, rather than simple past exposure, may be involved in the initiation or perpetuation of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.

 

In Hashimoto’s  patients with underactive thyroid function, higher levels of EBNA-1 IgG, a marker of latent viral presence, were inversely correlated with low T3 levels, suggesting that the greater the viral activity or immune response to EBV, the lower the thyroid hormone production.

 

Additionally, among healthy individuals, higher EBNA-1 IgG levels correlated with elevated anti-TPO antibodies, a key marker of thyroid autoimmunity. This indicates that EBV exposure may initiate autoimmune responses even before clinical disease appears.[31]

 

Graves Disease

 

EBV, which remains latent in B lymphocytes, has been detected in the thyroid tissue of 62.5% of Graves’ disease cases through the presence of EBV-encoded RNA (EBER), a marker of latent infection. 

 

Mechanistically in Graves’ disease, the excessive production of thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAb) overstimulates the thyroid gland, leading to hyperthyroidism. Given EBV’s ability to persist and periodically reactivate, researchers investigated its potential role in influencing these TRAb levels. 

 

Their findings demonstrated that TRAb levels were moderately but significantly correlated with EBV EA antibody levels, a marker of viral reactivation. This association suggests that EBV reactivation may stimulate B cells predisposed to produce TRAb, thereby amplifying the autoimmune response and potentially worsening the clinical severity of Graves’ disease. [9][31]

 

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

 

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) consistently exhibit elevated antibodies against multiple Epstein–Barr virus  proteins, including EBNA-1, EBNA-2, VCA, and EA. In addition, EBV DNA levels are approximately ten times higher in RA patients compared to healthy controls, suggesting persistent or reactivated viral infection. Notably, EBV DNA and transcripts have also been detected at significantly higher levels within the synovial tissue of RA patients, implicating local viral activity in the inflamed joints.

 

Evidence further indicates impaired cellular immune control of EBV in RA. Where CD8⁺ T cells, which normally suppress EBV-infected B cells are often dysfunctional or exhibit features of exhaustion. 

 

Compounding this, EBV antigens such as EBNA-1 share sequence homology with human proteins expressed in joint tissues. This molecular mimicry may misdirect the immune response and contribute to the breakdown of self-tolerance, promoting autoimmunity and joint inflammation characteristic of RA [11].

 

Furthermore a study of 133 RA patients over six months demonstrated that as their RA symptoms improved, EBV antibody levels dropped. Across all patients, lower levels of long-term EBV antibodies (anti-EBNA1-IgG) were linked to remission. [10]

 

Multiple Sclerosis 

 

EBV has emerged as a key environmental factor in the development of multiple sclerosis (MS), with strong epidemiological and immunological evidence linking the two. Over 99% of individuals with MS are EBV-positive and MS is virtually unheard of in EBV-seronegative individuals. 

 

Large cohort studies have shown that the risk of MS increases 32-fold following EBV infection. Importantly, MS typically develops months to years after EBV infection, indicating that it is not caused by the acute phase but rather by long-term immune dysregulation.

 

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how EBV may trigger or sustain MS. One is EBV’s ability to infect and transform B cells, allowing autoreactive B cells that would normally undergo cellular death to survive and produce antibodies targeting self-antigens. These EBV-infected B cells can migrate to the central nervous system, where they may drive local inflammation and tissue damage. 

 

Furthermore, people with MS exhibit elevated defences against EBNA1, particularly  CD4+ T cells, which coordinate the immune response. In people with MS, these CD4+ T cells react to EBNA1, but then can also mistakenly react to myelin, the protective coating around nerves. This is because parts of EBNA1 look similar to parts of myelin, a phenomenon called molecular mimicry.

 

Genetic factors, such as the HLA-DRB1*15:01 allele, the strongest genetic risk factor for 

MS also interacts with EBV exposure to increase disease risk. This allele is associated with elevated anti-EBNA1 antibody levels and altered T-cell responses. 

 

Overall, EBV appears to be a necessary factor in MS pathogenesis. Its ability to manipulate B-cell survival, provoke cross-reactive immune responses, and alter antigen presentation likely contributes to the autoimmune processes seen in MS. [12][33]

 

Sjorgens Syndrome (SjS)

 

Presence of EBV DNA and proteins was found in the salivary glands of approximately 50% of participants in 2 studies involving 8 and 7 patients with Sjorgrens Syndrome, compared to only 8% of healthy controls. [36][37] 

 

Research is limited, but one study found that people with SjS are more likely to show signs of recent EBV reactivation compared to healthy individuals, by way of increased numbers of early-stage B-cells. In addition, there was a higher presence of specialized helper T-cells, which support B-cell growth and antibody production. This increased activity may contribute to a stronger and more harmful immune attack on the body’s own glands.

 

Researchers concluded that EBV may drive the immune system into overdrive in SjS, causing both B-cells and T-cells to become overly active. This heightened immune response, especially in the glands, could explain the chronic tissue damage and inflammation commonly seen.

 

H.Pylori Negative Gastritis

 

In a cohort study involving 119 patients with gastritis who tested negative for Helicobacter pylori, EBV-infected gastric epithelial cells were identified in 14 cases. [39] Although the overall prevalence was relatively low, EBV infection should be considered as a potential etiological factor in cases of persistent, H. pylori-negative gastritis.

 

Chronic Fatigue

 

EBV is one of the most studied infectious triggers for CFS. After EBV infection, the immune system becomes highly active, and in some people, this immune activation doesn't shut off. EBV may “set the stage” for CFS, but not everyone exposed to EBV develops fatigue; it's a combination of biology, psychology, and behavior.

 

One study tracked 200 teenagers who had acute EBV infection and followed them for six months to see who developed lasting fatigue. At six months after infection 91 out of 195 (47%) still reported significant fatigue, and 14% met criteria for CFS. The study simultaneously discovered that fatigue wasn’t mainly predicted by only viral or immune measures like viral load alone. Rather, psychological and physical functioning at the time of illness are key risk factors, such as:

 

  • High anxiety levels at the time of infection

  • Lower physical activity 

  • Higher non EBV related inflammation

  • Lower vitamin B12 levels [38]

lONG-TERM signs

rEactIvatIon Causes

Psychological stress

 

Psychological stress plays a critical role in Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) pathogenesis in several ways. Firstly, psychological stress activates the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, a system that responds to perceived threats by triggering the release of cortisol. Elevated cortisol levels subsequently suppress cell-mediated immunity, particularly by impairing the function of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, both of which play critical roles in surveilling and eliminating EBV-infected cells.

 

In studies, individuals exposed to chronic stress, such as social instability, bereavement, or economic hardship, demonstrate elevated EBV-specific antibodies, which are widely regarded as markers of viral reactivation. 

 

Additionally, stress-induced mediators such as norepinephrine and cortisol influence immune cell behavior by modulating cytokine production and gene expression profiles. These neuroendocrine-immune interactions can promote the activation of key transcription factors, including BZLF1, a viral gene that acts as the master switch for transitioning EBV into replication [7]. 

 

Immunosuppression [ Innate Immune Impairment ] 

 

When the immune system is weakened the body loses critical surveillance by CD8+ T cells and other immune components that normally keep EBV in check. This is especially concerning in EBV latency because the virus resides silently in B cells and depends on immune pressure to remain inactive. Without this pressure, EBV can more easily reactivate, leading to increased viral replication and, in some cases, the development of EBV-associated diseases.[1]

 

Heavy Metal Toxicity 

 

  • Arsenic

  • Cadmium

  • Lead

  • Mercury 

 

Heavy metals can trigger changes inside our cells, causing them to produce more of certain proteins called PML nuclear body proteins. These proteins normally help regulate how our genes are expressed, but viruses like Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) have learned how to hijack them to help themselves grow and multiply. One of these proteins is called Sp110b, which is especially useful to EBV because it helps the virus stabilize its genetic material so it can produce more virus particles. Therefore, by increasing the amount of Sp110b in the cell, heavy metals may indirectly make it easier for EBV to replicate and spread. [41][42]

 

Beyond this, heavy metals are also linked to increased EBV reactivations primarily because of their immunosuppressive effects. These metals interfere with the normal functioning of the immune system by impairing immune cell activity. This weakened immune surveillance makes it easier for latent viruses like EBV to persist or reactivate. In the study individuals with higher levels of lead had a 45% increased risk of EBV infection [40]

 

Autoimmunity [ Tregs Dysfunction ] 

 

During infections or autoimmune responses, the body releases cytokines like TNF-α, IL-1β, and IFN-γ. These molecules act as messengers that regulate immune responses. However, they can also disrupt the stable environment inside EBV-infected cells, loosening the cellular control and enabling the virus to begin expressing its active genes.

 

Other Infections

 

Several viruses beyond Epstein–Barr Virus itself have been observed to trigger EBV reactivation, often by disrupting immune surveillance or activating molecular pathways critical to EBV's latent-to-lytic switch. These co-infecting viruses exploit host cell machinery or immune dysregulation to "awaken" EBV from dormancy:

 

  • Herpes Simplex Virus 1 – Activates the PKA–CREB pathway, turning on EBV

  • Human Herpesvirus 6 – Up-regulates EBV lytic genes, initiating viral replication.

  • Cytomegalovirus – Suppresses immune surveillance, allowing EBV to reactivate.

  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus – Causes CD4+ T cell depletion, weakening control

  • COVID – Interacts with host proteins destabilising EBV latency mechanisms [6]

 

Oxidative Stress

 

When cells undergo stress, due to factors like oxidative damage a repair protein called ATM kinase is activated. This kinase triggers downstream transcription factors, which can bind to the viral BZLF1 promoter, effectively “flipping the switch” to turn EBV back on. These stresses are like red flags that signal the cell is vulnerable, providing EBV the chance to reactivate.

 

Peanuts


Peanuts and processed peanut products are frequently contaminated with aflatoxins, a group of potent toxins produced by the fungus Aspergillus flavus. Among these, Aflatoxin B1 is the most common found in peanuts, in quantities that exceed safety limits. 

 

In the context of Epstein–Barr Virus, Aflatoxin B1 has been shown to trigger reactivation of the virus from its inactive phase into its lytic (active) replication cycle. This is achieved through the PI3K-AKT-MAPK signaling pathway, which leads to the production of viral prot

References

 

[1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7324166/

[2] https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/16/5/747

[3] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmv.29765

[4] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39104887/

[5] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3016066/

[6].https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article/doi/10.1093/femspd/ftae002/7590836

[7] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8470332/

[8] https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/11/9/1380

[9] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25931043/

[10] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10525384/

[11] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1526553/

[12] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41582-023-00775-5

[13] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5868753/

[14] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15630723/

[15] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37317236/

[16] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8470332/

[17] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1112101/

[18] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10818872/

[19] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC464871/

[20] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04432-7

[21] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11402932/

[22].https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867422011217

[23] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31356378/

[24] https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2179789

[25].https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S000292709900204

[26] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3519585/

[27] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8420900/

[28] https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1534735412458827

[29] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4303894/

[30] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5217310/

[31].https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462372030017X

[32] https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/vim.2010.0072

[33] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cti2.1451

[34] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7444145/

[35] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9651941/

[36] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1848394/

[37] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8909241/

[38].https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159118306251

[39].https://turkjgastroenterol.org/en/epstein-barr-virus-infection-in-patients-with-chronic-gastritis-without-helicobacter-pylori-infection-136208

[40] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11298456/

[41] https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/jvi.78.17.9412-9422.2004

[42] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1535610810002412

[43] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-90351-y

[44] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/all.15471

[45] https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(23)00331-0/fulltext

[46] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8784775/

bottom of page